McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Chau v. Chau CA4/1
- In re Amara O. CA4/1
- P. v. Arrubias CA4/1
- P. v. Chestang CA4/1
- P. v. Delegge CA4/1
- P. v. Horton CA4/1
- P. v. Ortega CA4/1
- P. v. Wolcott CA4/1
- In re Jordan H. CA4/1
- Reyenga v. Goyal CA4/1
- In re Tobacco Cases I
- P. v. Torres CA4/1
- Chamat v. Latham & Watkins CA4/1
- Grantville Action Group v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- In re S.W. CA4/1
- P. v. Morales CA4/1
- Gal v. Panto USA CA4/1
- P. v. Behbahani CA4/1
- P. v. Sharp CA4/1
- In re Tobacco Cases I CA4/1
- In re D.J. CA4/1
- P. v. Bentley CA4/1
- Marriage of Perez CA4/1
- P. v. Romero CA4/1
- P. v. Carter CA4/1