McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Sanders CA4/1
- People v. Sanders CA4/1
- Baggay v. Linfield Christian School CA4/1
- People v. Cortez CA4/1
- Plumer v. Rigdon CA4/1
- People v. Wong CA4/1
- Briskin v. Oceanside Marina Towers Assn. CA4/1
- People v. Cepeda CA4/1
- People v. Johnson CA4/1
- Universal Protection Service v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Cota CA4/1
- People v. Sanchez CA4/1
- People v. Truillo CA4/1
- In re H.G. CA4/1
- People v. Ingram CA4/1
- Sapinish Inn v. Nara Bank CA4/1
- People v. Sissac CA4/1
- Salazar v. Avis Budget Group CA4/1
- Winternitz v. Winternitz CA4/1
- Universal Protection Services v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Gallion CA4/1
- Hemphill v. Wright Family, LLC
- In re Robin D. CA4/1
- People v. Morris CA4/1
- Cosco Fire Protection v. Siry Investments CA4/1