McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Velasco CA4/1
- People v. Lavoie CA
- In re N,R. CA4/1
- Moore v. City of Lemon Grove
- Pala Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego Dept. of Environmental Health CA4/1
- Marriage of Osborn & Musalman CA4/1
- People v. Butts CA4/1
- Save Our Heritage Organisation v. City of San Diego
- People v. Lombardi CA4/1
- S.C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- People v. Charlesworth CA4/1
- People v. Lee CA4/1
- Yazdani v. Bank of America CA4/1
- inewsource v. Super. Ct. Ca4/1
- Wu v. City of Poway CA4/1
- People v. Alvarado CA4/1
- People v. Kueny CA4/1
- People v. Cruz CA4/1
- People v. Matz CA4/1
- Alexander v. Market Street Apartments CA4/1
- In re Martinez CA4/1
- In re S.M. CA4/1
- Esparza v. PulteGroup CA4/1
- Dalia C. v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- Sizzler USA Restaurants v. Superior Court CA4/1