Mathes
C
98% — 128.0 of 130 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 51% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Fletes-Mora v. Rogers
- United States v. Walley
- United States v. Yates
- Hixson v. Hixson
- In re Segal
- Delco Chemicals, Inc. v. Cee-Bee Chemical Co.
- In re Sears
- Hill v. United Fruit Company
- Melleck v. Oliver J. Olson and Co.
- Reynolds v. Royal Mail Lines, Ltd.
- In Re Otto
- Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Company
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.
- Robertson v. Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc.
- Kunkel v. United States
- Arenas v. United States
- Farris v. San Diego Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
- Davis Pleating & Button Co. v. California Sportswear & Dress Ass'n
- Lake v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
- Dolgoff v. Kaynar Co.
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Pillsbury
- Gibbons v. Trapnell
- Silverton v. Valley Transit Cement Co.
- United States v. Klatt
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land