gno.law
Marilyn L. Huff
Work of Federal Government · source

Marilyn L. Huff

District judge · Superior Court of Southern District of California County · 1993–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 1991–

B--
99% — 280.5 of 282 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 38% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

125cases reviewed on appeal
309opinions authored
332panels sat on (not as author)
24%reversed, in whole or part, of 107 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 81 reversed 14 reversed in part 7 vacated 5 dismissed 4 remanded 2

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 6 reversed 1 dismissed 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 70 criminal 50 other 4 delinquency 1

By year: 1997 17 · 2018 11 · 2019 9 · 1998 9 · 2010 8 · 2011 7 · 2020 6 · 2017 6 · 2007 6 · 2024 5 · 2021 5 · 1999 5 · 2026 4 · 2025 3 · 2008 3 · 2022 2 · 2016 2 · 2012 2 · 2009 2 · 2005 2 · 1996 2 · 1993 2 · 2015 1 · 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 2006 1 · 2003 1 · 2002 1 · 2000 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. United States v. Roberto Marquez 21-50257 · 2022-07-21 · criminal · affirmed
  2. Dipito LLC v. Manheim Riverside 3:21-cv-01205 · 2022-07-15 · civil
  3. Cordova v. Imperial County Narcotics Task Force 3:21-cv-00445 · 2022-07-07 · civil
  4. Carlsberg v. Wilken 3:21-cv-01746 · 2022-07-06 · civil
  5. Kendall v. Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. 3:20-cv-01828 · 2022-06-06 · civil
  6. K.J.P. v. San Diego, County of 3:15-cv-02692 · 2022-05-02 · civil
  7. In Re: Solara Medical Supplies Data Breach Litigation 3:19-cv-02284 · 2022-04-20 · civil
  8. Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. 3:20-cv-01723 · 2022-04-18 · civil
  9. Rudy v. U.S. Department of Justice 3:21-cv-01825 · 2022-04-07 · civil
  10. Lee v. Saul 3:20-cv-01596 · 2022-03-29 · civil
  11. Hussaini v. Tsunami VR, Inc. 3:21-cv-00667 · 2022-03-21 · civil
  12. Rewardify, Inc. v. Synvest Canco, Inc. 3:21-cv-00046 · 2022-03-10 · civil
  13. Nieves v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company 3:21-cv-01415 · 2022-02-11 · civil
  14. G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Vazuez 3:21-cv-00263 · 2022-02-07 · civil
  15. Radcliff v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company 3:20-cv-01555 · 2022-02-03 · civil
  16. Garcia v. Quest Group Consulting LLC 3:21-cv-02041 · 2022-01-26 · civil
  17. Kendall v. Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. 3:20-cv-01828 · 2022-01-18 · civil
  18. Kulhanek v. Atria Rancho Penasquitos 3:21-cv-01917 · 2022-01-13 · civil
  19. Urista v. Wells Fargo & Company 3:20-cv-01689 · 2022-01-11 · civil
  20. Kendall v. Odonate Therapeutics, Inc. 3:20-cv-01828 · 2022-01-11 · civil
  21. Healy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 3:20-cv-01838 · 2022-01-11 · civil
  22. Hussaini v. Tsunami VR, Inc. 3:21-cv-00667 · 2022-01-03 · civil
  23. Baldwin Academy, Inc. v. Markel Insurance Company 3:20-cv-02004 · 2021-12-17 · civil
  24. Estate of Jose Alfredo Castro Gutierrez v. Castillo 3:21-cv-01292 · 2021-12-17 · civil
  25. Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. 3:20-cv-01723 · 2021-12-13 · civil