Josephine L. Staton
Judge, District Court, C.D. California 2010–
A-
provisional — 100% — 3.0 of 3 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 16% of 51 graded judges, but ten orders are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
2cases reviewed on appeal
3opinions authored
3panels sat on (not as author)
—2 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2019 1 · 2018 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.