John A. Houston
Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 62 reversed in part 8 reversed 7 vacated 4 remanded 2 dismissed 2
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 3 reversed in part 2 vacated 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
criminal 54 civil 41 delinquency 3
By year: 2018 12 · 2011 10 · 2019 9 · 2010 9 · 2020 8 · 2017 8 · 2023 5 · 2016 5 · 2022 4 · 2021 4 · 2013 3 · 2009 3 · 2008 3 · 2007 3 · 2026 2 · 2025 2 · 2012 2 · 2006 2 · 2024 1 · 2015 1 · 2014 1 · 2005 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Perez v. United States of America
- Ronald Cohn, Inc. v. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
- United States v. Coleman Payne
- Jacquelyn McGee v. S-L Snacks National, LLC
- Ortiz-Luna v. United States
- Dorado v. Crumb
- Helvy v. Paramo
- Hosley v. Foulk
- Smith v. Avalos
- Romo, Jr. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
- Whynaught v. Colvin
- Krueger v. Wyeth Inc
- Freeborn v. Colvin
- Jackson v. Covello et.al.
- O'Donnell v. Nedd
- Hooper v. County of San Diego
- Bowell v. Nguyen
- Jones v. The Deparment of Justice
- Smith v. Wolf
- Riley v. Vizcarra
- Aigbekaen v. Apple Inc.
- Thomas-Weisner v. Gipson
- Dorsey v. Paramo
- Horton v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
- Taleff v. Sattgast Taleff