Jinsook Ohta
A++
provisional — 100% — 5 of 5 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
22cases reviewed on appeal
249opinions authored
249panels sat on (not as author)
22%reversed, in whole or part, of 18 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 vacated 3 reversed 1
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 6 vacated 3 reversed 2
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 7 · 2023 6 · 2024 5 · 2026 4 ·
Analysis
6 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Kelly v. City of Poway
- Pathway Innovations and Technologies Inc. v. Learning Glass Solutions, Inc.
- Sekerke v. Olsen
- Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.
- Gordon v. Elloyhim
- Toner v. National City Mortgage Co.
- Quevedo v. Blount
- FirstFire Global Opportunities Fund, LLC v. Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc.
- Trenton v. Carmax, Inc
- Hall v. Marriott International, Inc.
- Standifird v. Saul
- Johnson v. Kinney
- Sussman v. San Diego Police Dept.
- Gordon v. Elloyhim
- Upshaw v. Chau
- Edwards v. Pollard
- Barrett v. GEO
- Dunsmore v. Jones
- Johnson v. Kinney
- Santana v. Hemmerling
- Folley v. Gorman