James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Berry v. Crowell
- Soto v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.
- Finkle v. Tait
- Prichard v. Prichard
- American Fruit Distributors v. Hines
- Rothaermel v. Amerige
- Moore v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.
- Harris v. Mount Washington Co.
- Andrews v. First National Bank
- People v. Plumeyer
- People v. Carroll
- In Re Clark
- In Re Jones
- In Re Bruce
- Brigden v. Dodge
- People v. Flowers
- Citizens Trust & Savings Bank v. Bryant
- Kazman v. Light
- Vurpillat v. Vurpillat
- McBride v. McCartney
- Davenport v. Alexander
- City of Pasadena v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Jones v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Wagner v. City of Inglewood
- Bowen v. Hickey