James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Ching Wing v. Southern Pac. Co.
- Jackson v. Leonardt Peck
- Boyd v. Pendegast
- De Ledesma v. Stanley
- Ray v. Clark
- People v. Mandevil
- Scott v. Delta Land & Water Co.
- Hall v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Uhl v. Fertig
- Sauble v. Gary South Coast Agency
- People v. Boardman
- Industrial Development & Land Co. v. Goldschmidt
- Hargrave v. Moody
- Wall v. Calhoun
- Gary South Coast Agency v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Tucker
- People v. Wignall
- People v. Condley
- People v. Gonzales
- Rindge v. Crags Land Co.
- People v. Bowers
- Feisthamel v. Campbell
- W. J. Bush & Co. v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.
- Flores v. De Flores
- Andreson Co. v. County of Los Angeles