James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re Foley
- Southern Counties Gas Co. v. City of Long Beach
- United States v. Mozumdar
- San Diego & A. Ry. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
- Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Owen
- Bloom v. Furness-Withy & Co.
- Perkins Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Owen
- In re Levinson
- Cobb Temperature Regulator Co. v. Baird
- The Canadian Farmer
- Lincoln v. Chamberlain
- Elliott & Horne v. Chambers Land Co.
- People v. Klopfer
- People v. Smith
- In Re Adams
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- Crandall v. Shay
- Miller v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
- Honey v. Honey
- Poindexter v. Los Angeles Stone Co.
- Morrow v. Morrow
- People v. Kady
- Swain v. Los Angeles Morris Plan Co.
- Wright v. Phillips
- Burd v. Downing