James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- McWilliams v. Hopkins
- United States v. Southern Pac. R.
- Ex Parte T. Nagata
- Ex parte Turner
- United Dredging Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- In re Shields & Mattison
- Lynch v. Lentz
- The Cardiganshire
- Los Angeles & S. L. R. v. United States
- Paramore v. MacK Sennett, Inc.
- United States v. Southern California Wholesale Grocers' Ass'n
- United States v. Invader Oil Corporation
- Miller & Pardee, Inc. v. Lawrence A. Sweet Mfg. Co.
- Lorraine v. Townsend
- Ocean Motorship Co. v. Hammond Lumber Co.
- United States v. Two Automobiles & Five Cases of Whisky
- In re Hersvik
- United States v. Goodwin
- In re Foley
- In re Gustavson
- Layne & Bowler Corp. v. American Well & Prospecting Co.
- Roberti v. Jonas
- In re Parker
- Keyes v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. of Milwaukee
- The Canadian Farmer