James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- First National Bank v. Ziegler
- Home Payment Jewelry Co. v. Smith
- People v. Rader
- Morgrage v. National Bank of California
- Webber v. Smith
- Hunt v. Manning
- Western Implement Co. v. Blodgett
- Strait v. Wilkins
- Keefe v. Superior Court
- People v. Principe
- People v. Rial
- Robinson v. Bledsoe
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. Pillsbury
- Walker v. City of Los Angeles
- Mesmer v. Board of Public Service Commissioners
- Diamond v. Fay
- People v. Quan Gim Gow
- Neuhart v. George K. Porter Co.
- Rawles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.
- People v. Cramley
- Fisher v. Fisher
- Taylor v. Simi Construction Co.
- Young v. Young
- People v. Ostrander
- Schenck v. Hirshfeld