James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Thornber v. Hart
- Commins v. Guaranty Oil Co.
- Lapique v. Morrison
- Perkins v. Perkins
- Anderson v. Lewis
- Stroud v. Fairbanks
- Tingey v. Callahan Construction Co.
- People v. Richman
- People v. Rivera
- People v. Morrell
- People v. Murphy
- Peairs v. Chambers
- Matter of Application of Bell
- Cooper v. Stansbury
- People v. Southwell
- Firth v. Los Angeles Pacific Land Co.
- Keaton v. Southern California Edison Co.
- People v. McKamy
- People v. Haas
- People v. Ah Leo
- Holder Lumber Co. v. Scarborough
- Rogers v. Scott
- Hullinger v. Big Sespe Oil Co.
- Hawley v. State Assurance Co.
- Highland Park Investment Co. v. List