James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Robinson v. Baker
- Rayhill v. Southern Pacific Co.
- La Habra Oil Co. v. Francis
- Lefavor v. Ludolph
- People v. Rogers
- People v. Brennan
- Easterly v. Praul
- City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Imperial Land & Stock Co. v. Oster
- Connely v. Superior Court
- Dunham v. McDonald
- Lillard v. Abbott Hardware Co.
- Lillard v. Abbott Hardware Co.
- Oliphant v. "Home Builders."
- Starbuck v. City of Fullerton
- Torrey v. Refrigeration Plants Manufacturing Co.
- County of Riverside v. Alberhill Coal & Clay Co.
- People v. Gasser
- In Re Whittington
- Terry v. Southern Pacific Co.
- In Re Holt
- Cunnison v. Miller
- O'Donnell v. Superior Court.
- Saxon v. Buckeye Manufacturing Co.
- McDonagh v. Industrial Accident Commission