James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- West v. Board of Education
- People v. Diamondstein
- People v. Luttrell
- Hale v. Kennedy
- Watterson v. Hillside Water Co.
- Hay v. Hollingsworth
- Ramsdell v. Raymond
- Kurtz v. De Johnson
- Vandegrift v. Mullen
- Wible v. City of Bakersfield
- Schultheiss Bros. Co. v. Hunziker
- Shattuck v. Palmer
- Beazley v. Embree
- Stouffer v. Eymann
- Ellis v. Sanberg
- People v. Huntoon
- People v. Huntoon
- People v. Khan
- People v. Loza
- Marr v. City of Glendale
- Haun v. Tally
- Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles
- Thomas v. Newmark Grain Co.
- Grbavach v. Casualty Co. of America
- O'Neil v. Brode