James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Boland v. Smith
- Mortgage Securities Co. v. Pfaffman
- Erickson v. Erickson
- Stott v. Southern Sierras Power Co.
- Dunton v. Tanigoshi
- Hogue-Kellogg Co. v. Baker
- People v. City of San Bernardino
- Lee v. De La Motte
- Pasadena Trust & Savings Bank v. Bryson
- Henning v. Clark
- Maxwell v. Western Auto Stage Co.
- Farmer v. Leaf
- Bowring v. Prime
- Patrick v. Tetzlaff
- Travis Glass Co. v. Robbins
- Himovitz v. Silverman
- Smith v. Peters
- Chambers v. Security Commercial & Savings Bank
- E. Bastheim Co. v. Schultz
- Harpold v. Slocum
- Los Angeles Humane Society v. Adler
- City of Los Angeles v. McKeag
- Southern California Oil Syndicate of London, England v. Lompoc Produce & Real Estate Co.
- Zimmerman v. Prior
- Mitchell v. Mitchell