James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Smith v. United Crude Oil Co.
- Hoyt v. Thomas
- Lovelace v. G.L. Crenshaw
- Yocum v. Taylor
- Gugliemetti v. Graham
- Leachman v. Cage
- Rosen v. Dawson
- King v. Cline
- De Soto v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.
- Lewis v. Reed
- Blake v. Arp
- Archibald v. Archibald
- People v. Ruiz
- Thomas v. Layer
- Griswold v. Frame
- Haskett v. Hartwick
- Keiser v. Butte Creek Consolidated Dredging Co.
- Lewis v. Crenshaw
- Chastek v. Albertson
- Hutchison v. Holland
- Hyman v. Karl Stern Co.
- Bhumgara v. Gazvini
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Gould
- Leaver v. Smith
- Tennant v. Cline