James
D-
97% — 110.5 of 114 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 74% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Shaw v. Union Escrow & Realty Co.
- Board of Education v. Talbert
- Nagle Sexson v. Sexson
- People v. Dean
- Wright v. Wright
- Ushirohira v. Stuckey
- Bolan v. Gallagher
- Janson v. Bryant
- Favorite v. Superior Court
- Harlan v. Willard
- Winters v. Lindsay
- Hunstock v. Royal Securities Corp.
- Anaheim Citrus Fruit Ass'n v. Yeoman
- Trask v. Garza
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Wasco Land & Stock Co.
- Arnaz v. Forbes
- People v. Johnson
- Lopez v. Payne
- Zarillo v. Le Mesnager
- W. J. Bush & Co. v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.
- Primmer v. C. C. Harris Oil Co.
- Flournoy v. Everett
- Hyde v. Wilde
- Parish v. Studebaker
- Miller v. Shaw