James M. Carter
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 16% of 51 graded judges, but ten orders are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In Re Varney's Petition
- Duffin v. Duffin
- In Re Capital Service, Inc.
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.
- United States v. Parkinson
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
- Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting System
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
- United States v. Sutter
- Ferrante v. Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
- Superior Insurance Company v. Restituto
- Atlanta Corporation v. Olesen
- Anderson v. Hearst Pub. Co.
- Cantlay & Tanzola v. United States
- Associated Tel. Co. v. Communication Workers
- United States v. 3 Cartons, More or Less, "No. 26 Formula GM"
- Engleman v. Commodity Credit Corp.
- Loew's Inc. v. Wolff
- Capadona v. the Lake Atlin
- In Re San Clemente Electric Supply
- PEOPLE, ETC. v. Coast Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n
- Myers v. Shell Oil Co.
- United States v. Valenzuela
- Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.