James A. Mangione
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2015–
A--
80% — 40 of 50 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 16% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
27cases reviewed on appeal
19%reversed, in whole or part, of 26 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 21 reversed 4 reversed in part 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2025 7 · 2024 7 · 2023 7 · 2026 5 · 2021 1 ·
Analysis
47reviewed cases analysed
167rulings read
1rulings where the model disagrees with the court
8cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Regents of the U. of Cal. v. Murphy CA4/1
- Murthi v. Apple CA4/1
- Cotton v. Geraci CA4/1
- Cotton v. Geraci CA4/1
- Stone Ash v. Kettner Investments CA4/1
- Ghosal v. Ajou CA4/1
- Siddell v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- Russo v. Dinneen CA4/1
- De Meo v. Cooley LLP
- Montez v. U.S. Bank CA4/1
- Martinez v. Midway Venture CA4/1
- Hester v. Lewiston Condominiums Homeowners' Assn. CA4/1
- Greener v. M. Phelps, Inc.
- Hanby v. Elite Show Services CA4/1
- Ghosal v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CA4/1
- Neels v. Silver Oak Management CA4/1
- Butler v. Nationstar Mortgage CA4/1
- Young v. City of Coronado CA4/1
- Gonzalez v. Hudson Insurance Co. CA4/1
- Spikes v. Ubence CA4/1
- Baltazar v. Ace Parking Management CA4/1
- Garske v. California Automoble Insurance Company CA4/1
- Sherlock v. Austin CA4/1
- Kramer v. Park Central Towers Owners Assn. CA4/1
- S.H. v. P.H. CA4/1