Jacqueline M. Stern
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 1998–
B+
74% — 93 of 125 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 26% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
59cases reviewed on appeal
28%reversed, in whole or part, of 57 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 41 reversed 11 reversed in part 5 other 1 dismissed 1
Areas
By year: 2014 11 · 2013 11 · 2021 10 · 2015 9 · 2016 7 · 2017 4 · 2020 3 · 2023 1 · 2022 1 · 2008 1 · 2005 1 ·
Analysis
112reviewed cases analysed
418rulings read
2rulings where the model disagrees with the court
21cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Rojas v. HSBC Card Services Inc.
- Mulvihill v. McDavid CA4/1
- City of Escondido v. Pacific Harmony Grove Development
- Martin v. Cal. Coastal Commission
- Champir, LLC v. Fairbanks Ranch Assn.
- Courtois v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems CA4/1
- Hawk v. Hulett CA4/1
- Martin v. Cal. Coastal Commission CA4/1
- Champir v. Fairbanks Ranch Assn. CA4/1
- Vasquez v. Jameson Management CA4/1
- Radcliff v. Interfaith Community Services CA4/1
- United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Apical Industries, Inc. CA4/1
- Perez v. Blay CA4/1
- Sunderland v. Tombakian CA4/1
- Hedayatzadeh v. City of Del Mar
- R.W.L. Enterprises v. Oldcastle, Inc.
- Emerald Aero v. Kaplan
- Emerald Aero, LLC v. Kaplan
- Cape Concord Homeowners Assn. v. City of Escondido
- San Diegans etc. v. City of Oceanside
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of Oceanside
- Benson v. MEK Escondido CA4/1
- Farthi v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA4/1
- People v. Continental Heritage Ins. Co. CA4/1
- Bosstick v. Unhold CA4/1