Hollzer
D-
97% — 32.0 of 33 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 73% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Carr v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
- United States v. Minder
- Oliva v. Goleta Lemon Ass'n
- United States v. 21 Acres of Land
- Bowles v. C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co.
- Gingg v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
- Cummings v. Universal Pictures Co.
- Wilson Employees' Representation Plan v. Wilson & Co.
- Hopper v. Lennen & Mitchell, Inc.
- Wilcox v. De Witt
- Brown v. Lee
- American Fishermen's Tuna Boat Ass'n v. Rogan
- Bogdanovich v. Gasper
- In re Zemansky
- Ex parte Lee Bock Fook
- Birch v. McColgan
- In Re Maier Brewing Co.
- In re Consolidated Rock Products Co.
- Mutual Orange Distributors v. Agricultural Prorate Commission
- Olsen v. United States
- Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
- Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
- Mutual Orange Distributors v. Agricultural Prorate Commission
- American Encaustic Tiling Co. v. Pacific Tile & Porcelain Co.
- Solomon v. Welch