Harold T. Wilson, Jr.
B+
75% — 12 of 16 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 25% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
45cases reviewed on appeal
13%reversed, in whole or part, of 39 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 28 modified 6 dismissed 6 reversed 3 reversed in part 2
Areas
By year: 2023 6 · 2022 6 · 2024 5 · 2025 4 · 2021 4 · 2015 4 · 2014 4 · 2013 4 · 2016 3 · 2026 2 · 2020 2 · 2019 1 ·
Analysis
22reviewed cases analysed
65rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
6cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Thomas CA4/2
- People v. Jimenez CA4/2
- People v. Anderson CA4/2
- People v. Anderson CA4/2
- People v. Tejeda
- People v. Linneman CA4/2
- People v. Lopez CA4/1
- People v. Knox CA4/2
- People v. Castaneda CA4/2
- People v. Montgomery CA4/1
- People v. Rey CA4/3
- People v. Ramirez CA4/2
- People v. Diaz CA4/2
- People v. Fullen CA4/2
- People v. Scholl CA4/2
- People v. Redmond CA4/2
- People v. Smith CA4/2
- The People v. Sanders CA4/2
- P. v. Solari CA4/2
- People v. Zarco CA4/2