Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Brigham v. Southern Pacific Co.
- McConnell v. Fox
- Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. Los Angeles Pacific Boulevard & Development Co.
- Wile v. Los Angeles Ice & Cold Storage Co.
- Fox v. Townsend
- Turner v. Fidelity Loan Concern
- Newell v. Brill
- Wyman v. Hooker
- Downing v. Donegan
- Millard v. County of Kern
- Bradley v. Bush
- People v. Green
- People v. Turner
- People v. Hill
- Bell v. Wyman
- Thomas v. Bolsa Land Co.
- Valle v. Shaffer
- Hatfield v. Casner
- Armantage v. Superior Court
- Ex Parte Childs
- Fraser v. California Street Cable Railroad
- Humboldt Lumber Mill Co. v. Crisp
- Clark v. Supreme Council of Order of Chosen Friends
- Cameron v. Burnham
- Lagomarsino v. Giannini