Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Rowland v. Watson
- People v. Melandrez
- Merritt v. McFarland
- Winchester v. Becker
- Crowell v. Ewing
- Wright v. Coules
- Hesperia Land and Water Co. v. Gardner
- Miller v. Griffith
- Wyckoff v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Koyer v. Benedict
- Rowe v. Southern California Railway Co.
- In Re Lewis
- People v. Fernandez
- Prince v. Kennedy
- Mattern v. Canavan
- Southern California Lumber Co. v. Peters
- Clint v. Eureka Crude Oil Co.
- Morgan v. County of San Diego
- Van Leuven v. Van Leuven
- Prince v. Kennedy
- Hughes Brothers v. Hoover
- Connolly v. Lost Horse Mining & Milling Co.
- Davidson v. Baldwin
- Brown v. Los Angeles Railway Co.
- Humphry v. Buena Vista Water Co.