Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Prince v. Lamb
- Pereira v. City Savings Bank
- Brewer v. Horst and Lachmund Co.
- Wolfskill v. Douglas
- Gillon v. Northern Assurance Co.
- Carlin v. Lifur
- People v. Mooney
- South San Bernardino Land & Improvement Co. v. San Bernardino National Bank
- Richardson v. Diss
- County Bank v. Greenberg
- Donnelly v. Adams
- County of Los Angeles v. Spencer
- McKee Stair Building Co. v. Martin
- Meyer v. Haas
- Calkins v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n
- People v. Holmes
- People v. Hettick
- Rohrer v. Babcock
- Bank of Commerce v. Scofield
- More v. Finger
- Cowdery v. McChesney
- People v. Solomon
- Hellman v. City of Los Angeles
- Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. Bank
- Patch v. Miller