Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Obermeyer v. Patterson
- Ryland v. Heney
- Galindo v. Roach
- Patterson v. Doe
- Sutro v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.
- Eppinger v. Scott
- Brill v. De Turk
- Woodham v. Allen
- Sims v. Petaluma Gaslight Co.
- Procter v. Southern California Railway Co.
- Meyer v. Parsons
- Reclamation District No. 108 v. West
- Wright v. Perry Byrne
- People Ex Rel. Warfield v. Sutter Street Railway Co.
- Marks v. Evans
- Williams v. Gross
- County Bank v. Goldtree
- Schwind v. Hall
- L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. Walker
- Carpenter v. Furrey
- Toy v. Haskell
- Bonestell v. Bowie
- Pierce v. Merrill
- Town of Cloverdale v. Smith
- Schroeder v. Pissis