Gray
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Areas
By year: 1990 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Minaker v. California Canneries Co.
- Aldrich v. Barton
- Hilmer v. Hills
- Gabriel v. Tonner
- Strong v. Los Nietos & Ranchito Walnut Growers' Ass'n
- Buckman v. Hatch
- Dowdell v. Carpy
- Latimer v. Capay Valley Land Co.
- Converse v. Scott
- Cooper v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway
- Temescal Oil Mining & Development Co. v. Salcido
- Ackerman v. Merle
- Doljanin v. Austrian Benevolent Society
- Ackerman v. Merle
- Ballard v. Nye
- Mansfield v. Eagle Box & Manufacturing Co.
- Quarg v. Scher
- Fletcher v. Maginnis
- Murphy v. Coppieters
- Rodgers v. Parker
- Wallace v. Dodd
- Hellier v. Russell
- Keyes v. Moy Jin Mun
- Wheeler v. Benjamin
- Los Angeles Traction Co. v. Wilshire