[fn†]
F--
provisional — 0% — 0 of 1 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 306 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
18cases reviewed on appeal
42%reversed, in whole or part, of 12 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
civil 9 criminal 6 probate 1 family 1 delinquency 1
By year: 1997 2 · 1996 2 · 1989 2 · 1987 2 · 1969 2 · 1993 1 · 1985 1 · 1979 1 · 1978 1 · 1976 1 · 1972 1 · 1971 1 · 1970 1 ·
Analysis
2 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- 216 Sutter Bay Associates v. County of Sutter
- Wolfgram v. Wells Fargo Bank
- In Re Roark
- Community Memorial Hospital v. County of Ventura
- Pleasant v. Celli
- People v. Ingels
- Cazares v. Saenz
- People v. Anderson
- Southern Pacific Land Co. v. Westlake Farms, Inc.
- Lavine v. Hospital of the Good Samaritan
- People v. Glover
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Societa Di Unione E Beneficenza Italiana
- Abella v. Riverside Unified School District
- People v. Rose
- SAN DIEGO ETC. BOY SCOUTS v. City of Escondido
- People v. Henry
- People v. Brewster
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of California