Eric A. Keen
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2018–
C--
61% — 17 of 28 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 59% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
31cases reviewed on appeal
35%reversed, in whole or part, of 31 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 17 reversed 8 reversed in part 3 modified 3
Areas
By year: 2025 15 · 2026 9 · 2024 4 · 2020 3 ·
Analysis
27reviewed cases analysed
83rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
1cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- N.K. v. Palm Springs Unified School District CA4/1
- Parsons v. City of Indian Wells
- Parsons v. City of Indian Wells
- Valle v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan CA4/2
- Parsons v. City of Indian Wells
- Valle v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. CA4/2
- The Colony at Cal. Oaks etc. v. Majestic Asset Management CA4/1
- The Colony at Cal. Oaks etc. v. Majestic Asset Management CA4/1
- O'Leary v. Jones CA4/1
- City of Moreno v. DeSantis CA4/1
- Manueles v. West Coast Drywall & Co. CA4/3
- Haacke v. Shea CA4/2
- Stewart v. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs CA4/1
- Smart & Final Logistics v. Teamsters Local 630 CA4/3
- LQ Investments v. Kim CA4/3
- People v. Gurtner CA4/1
- McCoy v. Fleetwood Aluminum Products CA4/1
- Think Eventos, LLC v. Cal. Dept. of Water Resources CA4/1
- Haacke v. Pfister CA4/2
- Palm Springs Promenade, LLC v. Dept. of Industrial Relations
- Mae M. v. Komrosky
- Trapp v. Maham Corp. CA4/2
- Pongs v. City of Riverside CA4/1
- Wicks Brewing Co. v. Boeldt CA4/1
- Majestic Asset Mgmt LLC v. The Colony at Cal. Homeowners Assn.