Edlene C. McKenzie
A+
88% — 29 of 33 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 7% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
19cases reviewed on appeal
18%reversed, in whole or part, of 17 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 14 writ denied 2 reversed 2 reversed in part 1
Areas
dependency 11 family 7 delinquency 1
By year: 2015 5 · 2014 5 · 2016 4 · 2013 2 · 2023 1 · 2021 1 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
37reviewed cases analysed
104rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
9cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- Marriage of Rookey CA4/1
- In re M.B. CA4/1
- In re K.B. CA4/1
- In re A.B.
- In re Cash L. CA4/1
- A.D. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- In re Jose L. CA4/1
- In re Jeremiah M. CA4/1
- In re Gianna I. CA4/1
- In re Z.M. CA4/1
- Faton v. Ahmedo
- Faton v. Ahmedo CA4/1
- In re E.D. CA4/1
- In re Alexandria A. CA4/1
- In re Esteban N. CA4/1
- Marriage of Sanidad CA4/1
- Jasmine B. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- In re Marriage of Bianco
- Marriage of DeRosa CA4/1