Maurice T. Dooling, Jr.
Judge, California Court of Appeal 1945–1960
A-
provisional — 100% — 4.0 of 4 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Rooney v. Sullivan
- Whitney v. Whitney
- Davinroy v. Thompson
- People v. Daniel
- Schaffer v. Claremont Country Club
- Decker v. S. H. Kress Co.
- Schoenbach v. Key System Transit Lines
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. Mannina
- Guardianship of Joaquin
- Marshall v. Superior Court
- People v. Kaluna
- Schwab v. Schwab
- People v. Christenbery
- Guardianship of Furr
- Pappas v. Bogard
- Johnston v. Key System Transit Lines
- Donnally v. Blankenstein
- Fong Hong May v. Fong Wan
- Kadota v. City & County of San Fracisco
- DeLosa v. Superior Court
- Margolis v. Teplin
- Maddox v. Rainoldi
- Pierce v. Standow
- Perrotti v. Sampson
- Pete v. Norberg