Maurice T. Dooling, Jr.
Judge, California Court of Appeal 1945–1960
A-
provisional — 100% — 4.0 of 4 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Fageol & Tate v. Baird-Bailhache Co.
- Kuck v. Raftery
- Turner v. Cook
- Rising v. Veatch
- Keeler v. Murphy
- Sarcady v. Biedenweg
- Jennings v. Ward
- Wold v. League of the Cross of the Archdiocese of San Francisco, Inc.
- Pepin v. Stricklin
- Modern Woodmen of America v. Gray
- Standard Oil Co. v. Woolner
- Interstate Lumber Co. v. Rightman
- Robinson v. Thornewill
- Pelkey v. Hodge
- People v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
- Coleman v. City of Oakland
- Cossi v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Finn v. Sullivan
- Gardner v. Kreig
- Massimio v. Taranto
- Schmitt v. Northern Counties Land & Cattle Co.
- Johnson v. Pickwick Stages System
- Lorry v. Englander Drayage & Warehouse Co.
- Peel v. California Belting Co., Inc.
- Strafiotis v. California Highway Indemnity Exchange