Maurice T. Dooling, Jr.
Judge, California Court of Appeal 1945–1960
A-
provisional — 100% — 4.0 of 4 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Newcomb & Co. v. Sainte Claire Realty Co.
- Ambra v. Woolsey
- Carter v. Carter
- Satariano v. Sleight
- San Francisco Unified School District v. City & County of San Francisco
- White v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
- Spalding v. Boutin
- Connors v. Connors
- Stricklin v. Rosemeyer
- Williamson v. Kinney
- Wynecoop v. Coats
- Serpa v. Davidson
- Dorswitt v. Wilson
- Spanfelner v. Meyer
- Moore v. Griffith
- Hedlund v. Sutter Medical Service Co.
- Silva v. Market Street Railway Co.
- United States Guarantee Co. v. Matson Navigation Co.
- Da Arauje v. Rodriques
- Calou v. Jones
- Lafrenz v. Stoddard
- Pearl v. Figoni
- Jones v. Bayley
- Carpenter v. Devitt
- Westlake v. Silva