Maurice T. Dooling, Jr.
Judge, California Court of Appeal 1945–1960
A-
provisional — 100% — 4.0 of 4 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Litchfield v. County of Marin
- Estate of Kurt
- Willoughby v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Gutknecht v. Paul
- Connors v. Jerome
- Estate of Spaulding
- Rench v. McMullen
- Somers v. Bank of America
- People v. Roberts
- Palpar, Inc. v. Thayer
- Hurley v. Kazantzis
- Wade v. City & County of San Francisco
- McCarthy v. McCarthy
- Estate of Reinhertz
- Fowlkes v. Ingraham
- Johnson v. Johnson
- Rather v. City & County of San Francisco
- People v. Ford
- McMahon v. McCulloch
- Roesman v. DeHart
- Dee v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement System
- Loveland v. City of Oakland
- Hughes v. Hearst Publications, Inc.
- People v. Cravens
- Manney v. Housing Authority