David D. Leshner
C+
99% — 83.5 of 84 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 44% of 51 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Keramati v. Kijakazi
- Dunsmore v. State of California
- Dior v. Kijakazi
- Calles v. Commissioner of Social Security
- Hernandez v. Kijakazi
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Wynne
- Wesenberg v. Kijakazi
- Moore v. Duran
- Mallory v. Kijakazi
- Snelson v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
- OSRX, Inc. v. Hyman Phelps & MacNamara, P.C.
- Sundberg v. Wallace
- Morton v. County of San Diego
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- Downs v. Allison
- Snelson v. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.
- Hernandez-Garcia v. Dana
- Viasat Inc. v. Lloyd's
- Ashirwad v. Charter Communications, LLC
- Hernandez-Garcia v. Dana
- Carroll Metal Works, Inc. v. Franklin
- Olguin v. Kijakazi
- SF 2402 LLC v. B.F.B., Inc.