David A. Williams
A++
provisional — 100% — 3 of 3 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
12cases reviewed on appeal
25%reversed, in whole or part, of 12 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2013 4 · 2015 3 · 2014 3 · 2021 1 · 2020 1 ·
Analysis
4 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- People v. Maljanian CA4/2
- People v. Flores CA4/2
- Ruelas v. Harper CA4/2
- Ruelas v. Harper CA4/2
- Ruelas v. Harper CA4/2
- Metros v. Chowdhary CA4/1
- Corona v. Dept. of Transportation CA4/1
- Franzen v. Brookfield Southland Builders CA4/3
- Legardy v. San Antonio Community Hosp. CA4/2
- Colonies-Pacific 19A v. Best Buy Stores CA4/2
- Lewis v. Wren CA4/2
- Noxsel v. Boquet Estates Owners Assn. CA4/2