gno.law
Dana M. Sabraw
Work of Federal Government · source

Dana M. Sabraw

District judge · Superior Court of Southern District of California County · 2006–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2003–

F++
98% — 525.5 of 536 orders sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 81% of 51 graded judges

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

129cases reviewed on appeal
619opinions authored
627panels sat on (not as author)
23%reversed, in whole or part, of 109 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 84 vacated 10 reversed 8 reversed in part 7 dismissed 5 remanded 3

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 18 reversed 2 reversed in part 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 63 criminal 62 probate 2 other 1 delinquency 1

By year: 2019 14 · 2010 14 · 2024 11 · 2020 9 · 2011 9 · 2025 8 · 2021 8 · 2007 7 · 2022 6 · 2017 6 · 2008 6 · 2023 5 · 2012 5 · 2009 5 · 2026 4 · 2018 4 · 2016 2 · 2014 2 · 2013 2 · 2006 2 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases

  1. Durkee v. Bank of America, N.A. 3:20-cv-00347 · 2020-08-05 · civil
  2. Walker v. United States of America 3:20-cv-00031 · 2020-08-04 · civil
  3. Lozano v. Reighley 3:19-cv-00884 · 2020-07-30 · civil
  4. Pruco Life Insurance Company v. California Energy Development, Inc. 3:18-cv-02280 · 2020-07-29 · civil
  5. Trepco Imports & Distribution, Ltd. v. Arizona Beverages USA, LLC 3:20-cv-00521 · 2020-07-28 · civil
  6. Pigment Inc. v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. 3:20-cv-00794 · 2020-07-28 · civil
  7. Davallou v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals US Head Quarters 3:20-cv-00619 · 2020-07-27 · civil
  8. Golden v. Rogers 3:19-cv-02178 · 2020-07-24 · civil
  9. Nemecek v. Finger One, Inc. 3:20-cv-00048 · 2020-07-23 · civil
  10. Alcantara v. Archambeault 3:20-cv-00756 · 2020-07-22 · civil
  11. Alcantara v. Archambeault 3:20-cv-00756 · 2020-07-22 · civil
  12. Bonilla v. The Void Judgment of Alameda County, Case No. H-12210-A 3:20-cv-00881 · 2020-07-21 · civil
  13. Michael Hucul v. State of California 19-56056 · 2020-07-17 · civil · affirmed
  14. Perea v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. 3:20-cv-00610 · 2020-07-15 · civil
  15. Moore v. Lankford 3:19-cv-02406 · 2020-07-09 · civil
  16. Raines v. Front Porch Communities and Services 3:19-cv-01539 · 2020-07-07 · civil
  17. Bentley v. The Control Group Media Company, Inc. 3:19-cv-02437 · 2020-07-06 · civil
  18. Siglin v. Sixt Rent A Car, LLC 3:20-cv-00503 · 2020-06-25 · civil
  19. Global Ventu Holding B.V. v. Zeetogroup, LLC 3:19-cv-01018 · 2020-06-25 · civil
  20. Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc. 3:19-cv-00881 · 2020-06-24 · civil
  21. United States v. Roberto Lopez 18-50379 · 2020-06-17 · criminal · reversed in part
  22. Moore v. Lankford 3:19-cv-02406 · 2020-06-12 · civil
  23. United States v. Alex Gomez 19-50213 · 2020-05-07 · criminal · reversed in part
  24. Peggy Jennings v. Ramos Properties, Lp 19-55322 · 2020-05-06 · civil · affirmed
  25. United States v. Pablo Zamorano-Munoz 19-50193 · 2020-04-15 · criminal · affirmed