gno.law
Cynthia Ann Bashant
Work of Federal Government · source

Cynthia Ann Bashant

Judge · Superior Court of San Diego County · 2007–2026

Judge, District Court, S.D. California 2014– · Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego 2000–2014

B+
provisional — 75% — 6 of 8 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 25% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 8 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

92cases reviewed on appeal
1,245opinions authored
1,245panels sat on (not as author)
22%reversed, in whole or part, of 83 merits decisions

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 65 vacated 8 reversed in part 5 reversed 5 dismissed 2 remanded 1

The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets

affirmed 19 reversed in part 4 vacated 2 reversed 2 dismissed 2 other 1

Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.

Areas

civil 52 criminal 34 dependency 3 probate 1 family 1 delinquency 1

By year: 2021 14 · 2018 14 · 2020 13 · 2019 12 · 2025 7 · 2024 7 · 2023 5 · 2022 5 · 2017 4 · 2026 3 · 2016 3 · 2014 3 · 2013 1 · 2007 1 ·

Analysis

10reviewed cases analysed
22rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
0cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable

Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.

Cases

  1. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-20 · civil
  2. Ziegler v. GW Pharmaceuticals, PLC 3:21-cv-01019 · 2022-01-18 · civil
  3. Cota v. Porven, Ltd. 3:20-cv-01806 · 2022-01-18 · civil
  4. Shawarma Stackz LLC v. Jwad 3:21-cv-01263 · 2022-01-14 · civil
  5. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-13 · civil
  6. International Franchise Association v. State of California 3:20-cv-02243 · 2022-01-12 · civil
  7. Haynes v. Juarez 3:19-cv-02380 · 2022-01-12 · civil
  8. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-12 · civil
  9. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-11 · civil
  10. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-10 · civil
  11. Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. 3:15-cv-02287 · 2022-01-07 · civil
  12. Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. ClientPoint, Inc. 3:21-cv-01420 · 2022-01-04 · civil
  13. Kasain v. Unger 3:21-cv-01511 · 2022-01-03 · civil
  14. Witt v. Bristol Farms 3:21-cv-00411 · 2022-01-03 · civil
  15. O'Shea v. County of San Diego 3:21-cv-00582 · 2021-12-30 · civil
  16. Gopher Media LLC v. Melone 3:21-cv-01909 · 2021-12-29 · civil
  17. Lewis v. R.J. Donovan 3:21-cv-01266 · 2021-12-21 · civil
  18. Hawkins v. Gore 3:21-cv-01119 · 2021-12-21 · civil
  19. Strojnik v. Village 1017 Coronado, Inc. 3:19-cv-02210 · 2021-12-21 · civil · other
  20. Samaniego v. Covello 3:21-cv-00953 · 2021-12-21 · civil · other
  21. Al Otro Lado, Inc. v. McAleenan 3:17-cv-02366 · 2021-12-21 · civil
  22. Bahrambeygui v. Robertson 3:21-cv-01153 · 2021-12-20 · civil
  23. Escamilla Avina v. Patenaude & Felix, APC 3:20-cv-00166 · 2021-12-17 · civil
  24. Ewing v. BF Advance, LLC 3:20-cv-01748 · 2021-12-14 · civil
  25. Young v. Target Corporation 3:21-cv-01280 · 2021-12-14 · civil