Jesse W. Curtis, Sr.
Judge, California Supreme Court 1926–1945
A-
100% — 17.0 of 17 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
697opinions authored
769panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Lissner v. Superior Court
- Shealor v. City of Lodi
- Buxbom v. Smith
- Bacich v. Board of Control
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San Francisco
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor Council
- Estate of Hanley v. Hanley
- Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.
- McKnew v. Superior Court
- Moore v. Cal. Oregon Power Co.
- People v. Dail
- Shrimpton v. Superior Court of L. A.Cty.
- Strong v. Strong
- Pacific Lumber Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
- Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'n
- Krum v. Malloy
- People v. Guerrero
- Murphy v. Krumm
- Murphy v. Krumm
- Vallera v. Vallera
- Silberman v. Industrial Accident Commission
- Lissner v. Baldwin
- Borroughs v. McColgan
- Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & Converse
- Wulff-Hansen & Co. v. Silvers