Jesse W. Curtis, Sr.
Judge, California Supreme Court 1926–1945
A-
100% — 17.0 of 17 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 12% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
697opinions authored
769panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1919 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In Re Estate of Smead
- People v. Craven
- In Re Byers
- Roma MacAroni Factory v. Giambastiani
- Sunder v. Collins
- People v. Lippner
- Trimble v. Trimble
- Perry v. D. J. & T. Sullivan, Inc.
- Crangle v. City Council of Crescent City
- Bennett v. Bennett
- Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConville
- Miller v. Security-First Nat. Bk. of L.A.
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District
- Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. Martin
- San Mateo Planing Mill Co. v. Davenport Realty Co.
- People v. MacMullen
- Robbiano v. Bovet
- Tay-Holbrook, Inc. v. Tutt
- Wasson v. Maxfield
- Hersh v. Garau
- Caldwell v. Taylor
- Rhinock v. Price
- People v. Fleming
- People v. Morrison
- Rutherford v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District