Crocker
F
95% — 10.5 of 11 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 89% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Johnson v. Wide West Mining Co.
- Uridias v. Morrill
- Keller v. Sutrick
- Gluckauf v. Reed
- Wratten v. Wilson
- Reed v. Calderwood
- Keller v. Hicks
- Sleeper v. Kelly
- Rogers v. Soggs
- Spring Valley Water Works v. San Francisco
- Porter v. Liscom
- California State Telegraph Co. v. Alta Telegraph Co.
- In re Estate of Howard
- Robinson v. Bidwell
- High v. Shoemaker
- Gagliardo v. Crippen
- Powelson v. Powelson
- A. M. Gilman & Co. v. Cosgrove
- People v. Symonds
- Parsons v. Fairbanks
- Spence v. Harvey
- Daubenspeck v. Platt
- Cohen v. Wright
- Adams v. Knowlton
- Dolhequy v. Tabor