Crocker
F
95% — 10.5 of 11 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 89% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Roberts v. Chan Tin Pen
- Lathrop v. Middleton
- Goldman v. Davis
- Northam v. Gordon
- Pierson v. McCahill
- Colman v. Clements
- Brady v. O'Brien
- O'Brien v. Brady
- Tustin v. Faught
- Swinford v. Rogers
- Ladd v. Ruggles
- Schilling v. Holmes
- Boles v. Johnston
- Everett v. Hydraulic Flume Tunnel Co.
- Banks v. Marshall
- Antoine Co. v. Ridge Co.
- Tibbetts v. Moore
- Skillman v. Lachman
- McCarty v. Fremont
- Preston v. Keys
- Hayes v. Wells, Fargo & Co.
- People v. Todd
- Zeigler v. Wells, Fargo & Co.
- Gatewood v. McLaughlin
- Franklin v. State Board of Examiners