Crocker
F
95% — 10.5 of 11 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 89% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Halleck v. Moss
- Hoadley v. Crow
- Askew v. Ebberts
- Kidd v. Teeple
- Harper v. Richardson
- Mills v. Barney
- Wilkins v. Stidger
- Levinson v. Schwartz
- Dodge v. Walley
- McLaughlin v. Kelly
- Sampson v. Ohleyer
- Burpee v. Bunn
- Hill v. Taylor
- McLaren v. Hutchinson
- Reddington v. Waldon
- Lawrence v. Martin
- Bradley v. Kent
- Woodworth v. Knowlton
- Klockenbaum v. Pierson
- Richardson v. Scott River W. & M. Co.
- Fogarty v. Sparks
- Lazard v. Wheeler
- People v. Forbes
- Pierson v. McCahill
- Cormerais v. Genella