Craig Riemer
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside 2003–
A++
provisional — 100% — 4 of 4 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 1% of 312 graded judges, but ten rulings are needed for a standing letter — 4 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
32cases reviewed on appeal
21%reversed, in whole or part, of 29 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 22 reversed 4 writ granted 3 reversed in part 2 modified 1
Areas
By year: 2022 5 · 2013 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 3 · 2021 3 · 2015 3 · 2014 3 · 2025 2 · 2020 2 · 2017 2 · 2018 1 · 2016 1 ·
Analysis
2 of this judge's reviewed cases have an analysis; counts are shown from 10.
Cases
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.
- Rainier v. Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac CA4/2
- Johnson v. Temecula Valley Unified School District CA4/2
- J.R. v. Electronic Arts
- Borel v. City of Murrieta CA4/3
- Martinez v. CalCom Roofing CA4/1
- Continental East Development v. Superior Court CA4/2
- Sandoval v. Nippon Life Ins. Co. of America CA4/2
- Cell-Crete Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co.
- Ramirez v. Oxford Properties, Inc. CA4/2
- Barbier v. Beier CA4/2
- Estate of Barnes CA4/2
- Sellers v. S.C. CA4/2
- Albrecht v. County of Riverside
- Baker v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA CA4/2
- American Express Bank FSB v. Singh CA4/2
- Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.
- Fuentes v. TMCSF, Inc.
- Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College Dist.
- Bridges v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College Dist.
- Boswell v. The Retreat Community Assn. CA4/2
- Codilla v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/2
- Carmax Auto Superstores California v. Super. Ct. CA4/2
- Eriksson v. Nunnink