Cheryl C. Kersey
Judge, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino 2009–
F
45% — 5 of 11 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 89% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
89cases reviewed on appeal
24%reversed, in whole or part, of 75 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 56 reversed 10 writ denied 9 reversed in part 8 dismissed 5 modified 1
Areas
dependency 60 criminal 26 family 3
By year: 2014 20 · 2013 19 · 2015 14 · 2023 10 · 2025 6 · 2024 6 · 2016 6 · 2026 4 · 2017 2 · 2022 1 · 2021 1 ·
Analysis
14reviewed cases analysed
45rulings read
1rulings where the model disagrees with the court
2cases with a verified missed authority
1appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- In re D.L. CA4/2
- In re F.R. CA4/2
- S.E. v. Superior Court CA4/2
- In re E.C. CA4/2
- In re E.G. CA4/2
- In re D.T. CA4/2
- In re L.P. CA4/2
- In re E.D. CA4/2
- In re K.S. CA4/2
- In re A.F.
- San Benardino County Children & Family Services v. M.P.
- In re A.B. CA4/2
- In re A.H. CA4/2
- In re B.B. CA4/2
- In re A.P. CA4/2
- T.C. v. Superior Court CA4/2
- In re A.S. CA4/2
- In re N.P. CA4/2
- P. v. Ross CA4/2
- In re B v. CA4/2
- In re A.R. CA4/2
- In re C.M. CA4/2
- In re C.M. CA4/2
- R.S. v. Super. Ct. CA4/2
- In re L.P. CA4/2