Carr
A-
provisional — 100% — 6.0 of 6 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. Cory
- Dr. Ing HCF Porsche AG v. Superior Court
- Newbery Electric Corp. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board
- People v. Collins
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.
- Chambers v. Superior Court
- Margulis v. Myers
- People v. Newble
- People v. Galliher
- Feldman v. Sacramento Board of Realtors, Inc.
- People v. Young
- Pugh v. City of Sacramento
- Parker v. State Personnel Board
- Krieger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- Bossi v. State of California
- Herbert v. Superior Court
- People v. Savala
- In Re Marriage of Lopez
- People v. Mercer
- Nielsen Freight Lines v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- County of Placer v. Corin
- City of Sacramento v. Superior Court
- RONALD M. v. White
- Hudson Oil Co. v. Shortstop
- Kunzler v. Karde