Carr
A-
provisional — 100% — 6.0 of 6 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Kohler v. Aspen Airways, Inc.
- Syverson v. Heitmann
- People v. Traina
- Faunce v. Denton
- People v. Austin
- People v. Kane
- Rubio v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Bear Creek Planning Committee v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.
- Estate of Backer
- Brennan v. Gordon Ball, Inc.
- Heldt v. Municipal Court
- Rainer Mortgage v. Silverwood, Ltd.
- Shippen v. Department of Motor Vehicles
- People v. Smith
- People v. Dung T.
- County of Sacramento v. Loeb
- People v. Caddick
- People v. Dampier
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Employer's Insurance
- Franck v. Polaris E-Z Go Division of Textron, Inc.
- City of Sacramento v. State of California
- People v. Quijada
- Northgate Partnership v. City of Sacramento
- People v. Spain
- People v. West