Carr
A-
provisional — 100% — 6.0 of 6 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 6 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- County of Sacramento v. Judson W.
- Coast Elevator Co. v. State Board of Equalization
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Superior Court
- People v. Shegog
- Phillips v. State Personnel Board
- Freeman v. Lind
- People v. Kent W.
- Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Holdener
- People v. Taylor
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite Systems
- People v. Azure
- People v. Corners
- County of Butte v. Superior Court
- General Insurance v. Mammoth Vista Owners' Ass'n
- Carlile v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
- Allen v. Toten
- Taylor v. Buff
- In Re Vargas
- People v. Clark
- People v. Lewis
- Steelgard, Inc. v. Jannsen
- Vaughn Materials Co. v. Security Pacific National Bank
- People v. Dennis
- Nichols v. Great American Ins. Companies
- People v. Wilson